Updating systematic reviews

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Updating Systematic Reviews: An International Survey

BACKGROUND Systematic reviews (SRs) should be up to date to maintain their importance in informing healthcare policy and practice. However, little guidance is available about when and how to update SRs. Moreover, the updating policies and practices of organizations that commission or produce SRs are unclear. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The objective was to describe the updating practices a...

متن کامل

Does updating improve the quality of reporting of systematic reviews?

1 Community Information and Epidemiological Technologies (CIET), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam the Netherlands. 2 Professor of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3 Professor and Director, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Depar...

متن کامل

Role of Citation Tracking in Updating of Systematic Reviews

We proposed to use automatic citation tracking to enhance the retrieval of new evidence for updating Systematic Reviews (SR). We tested on a Cochrane review from 2003 (updated 2010) and retrieved 12 of the papers to be added (recall 85.7%). Citation tracking yields a high proportion of the required literature.

متن کامل

Updating search strategies for systematic reviews using EndNote

Performing, writing, and publishing a systematic review take a long time. In a cohort of journalpublished systematic reviews, Cochrane reviews, and health technology assessment reports, the median time lag between the stated last search date and publication was 61 weeks (interquartile range, 33–87 weeks) [1]. In the same cohort of reviews, 7% were out of date at the time of publication [2]. Mor...

متن کامل

Worldwide inequality in production of systematic reviews

Background: Investment in science is vital for the development and well-being of societies. This study aims to assess the scientific productivity of countries by quantifying their publication of systematic reviews taking the gross national income per capita (GNIPC) into account. Methods: Medline and ISI Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews published between 1st January 2006 an...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Physiotherapy

سال: 2018

ISSN: 1836-9553

DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.11.009